Saturday, August 26, 2006

CHARTING OUR FUTURE

(Please read the post, 'Forum For Seekers' before reading this post.)


Dr. Michael Smith, Dean of Education at Lourdes College in Toledo, was hired by our Parish Staff to facilitate a Strategic Planning Process for the Transfiguration of the Lord Parish. The Process will be in effect from July until May. His fee is $13,000, half of what he usually receives.
The Statement of Purpose of the Strategic Planning Process is: "To engage in a planning process that will provide direction as we strive prayerfully, to live our Parish Mission."

Guiding Principles for the Process: "As we proceed with the planning process we will strive to:

1. promote open, honest and respectful dialogue.
2. provide on-going communication.
3. be inclusive (as appropriate) in seeking input from the parish community, and
4. maintain our focus and remain faithful to the task.

The Process will be called, "Charting Our Future". There will be a Parish Leadership meeting for "Charting Our Future" on Aug 29th at 7:00. Individuals were invited by the staff on the basis of their leadership roles in specific parish ministries. The purpose of this meeting is "To identify and prioritize issues related to mission, programs, people, resources, and facilities."

Many on the Pastoral Council feel that the idea of a strategic plan for the growth of our parish is a commendable idea. I do not disagree with the basic idea, but question the implementation of that idea. I was speaking with a parishioner about our parish leadership, and she said she wished that we could "Get the elephant out of the room." She went on to say that the "elephant", so to speak, was the HUGE barrier of mistrust between many of the parishioners and our staff. This mistrust blocks any truly open and effective communication that would ultimately provide the same results that Mr. Smith's planning process intends to provide.

Does our Parish really need a "plan" to come together??? I hear over and over, from people in leadership positions, that our Parish needs to unite. I have asked many people to give me three criteria that would satisfy this demand for unity. I have yet to receive an answer. Come on, I'm serious! Dialogue is very important. It would be easier to work towards a goal, if it were stated plainly for the people to understand. It does not seem fair to criticize our parishioners for not "accepting change", when what they are expected to change into is really not spelled out. Does 'uniting' mean building a new church and tearing down all of the buildings? To be good Christians, should the people of St. Peter's, St. Mary's and St. Joseph's have embraced the directives of the Diocese without question? Parishes around the country are solving their problems with creativity, not closure.

I do not really think of the people in these communities as petty, uncooperative people. I tend to think that they are intelligent, thoughtful, spiritual people who willingly, and lovingly share their many gifts and talents. Throughout the year, the people involved with "Charting Our Future" will be asked to gather data about the people in our Parish. The staff (our priest and our Pastoral Associate) will conduct focus group meetings in the homes of parishioners this winter. These focus group meetings will not be in everyone's homes. The facilitator said that it would be a chance for people to "ask the tough questions" to our staff. Tough questions have been already asked. Genuine and thoughtful interaction between the staff and the parishioners would have already provided the answers. Investing our time, money and resources in any program such as "Charting Our Future", will be nonproductive until we escort the "elephant from the room".

In the meantime, let's respect our past, believe in our present, and THEN.........plan for the future.

8 Comments:

At August 29, 2006 7:54 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, I feel left out. What is the "elephant"? What has caused any mistrust?

 
At August 29, 2006 12:19 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

To start things rolling, how about: Parishioners had no real control over the destinies of their parishes in the first place or how handling the priest shortage could be creatively dealt with. From the invalid statistics to the meetings that were held. Some parishioners gave excellent suggestions. The whole thing was just unnecessary from my point of view.
We had no say as to how parish assets would be spent or distributed when churches were closed.
The re-naming of our Parish did not reflect the wishes of the parishioners, even though we were asked and gave input.
Next?

 
At August 29, 2006 1:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

$13,000? You've got to be kidding. I guess now we know why our parishioners are being charged $15 per child to attend religious education classes this year. Does anyone know where the money is to come from to pay the facilitator? I'd be interested in knowing.

 
At August 29, 2006 1:10 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I suppose it would be too much to ask for someone honesty. Come on "staff", time for some courage. If you really want the Parish to move forward, it's time to stop hiding the facts from the people you need.

 
At August 31, 2006 6:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

 
At August 31, 2006 8:52 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, cruise control, the elephant has been growing in size for quite a while now! I wouldn't know where to begin. I have tried very hard not to become "jaded", knowing all the things I know about what has been going on in the parish the past few years. By the grace of a very loving God, I still enjoy my ministries and am surprised everyday at how God opens my eyes and my heart a little more!
As far as the actual events that have caused so much mistrust, I will tell you about them, a few at a time. I would love to allow others to have the opportunity to remark about each.

 
At August 31, 2006 11:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

OOOpppsss!!!

Sorry,I am as new to posting on a blog as many of you are new to commenting on one! The "comment deleted" was not due to a rude comment on anyone's part. Alas, it was due to my wanting to know what would happen if I had to delete a comment! And now I know!

 
At September 02, 2006 8:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

What has caused mistrust? This is one example. When a couple have served as communion distributers together for years and the preist pulls one aside and asks a few yes or no questions for recommissioning afterward saying,"Ok you're good to go" (sounds like a Taco Bell commericial)
The next time the couple are on the schedule they are and pulled aside before Mass by sister and told you can serve you can't. Why? The other person attends Thursday services on a regular basis. Why did Father not pull the other person aside after Mass to ask the same questions as their spouse so the couple could continue to serve together? Father and sister talked about this and sister was the one to tell the couple one could serve and the other couldn't before Sunday Mass . Again I ask WHY?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home